Circular order hierarchy #
This file defines circular preorders, circular partial orders and circular orders.
Hierarchy #
- A ternary "betweenness" relation
btw : α → α → α → Prop
forms aCircularOrder
if it is- reflexive:
btw a a a
- cyclic:
btw a b c → btw b c a
- antisymmetric:
btw a b c → btw c b a → a = b ∨ b = c ∨ c = a
- total:
btw a b c ∨ btw c b a
along with a strict betweenness relationsbtw : α → α → α → Prop
which respectssbtw a b c ↔ btw a b c ∧ ¬ btw c b a
, analogously to how<
and≤
are related, and is - transitive:
sbtw a b c → sbtw b d c → sbtw a d c
.
- reflexive:
- A
CircularPartialOrder
drops totality. - A
CircularPreorder
further drops antisymmetry.
The intuition is that a circular order is a circle and btw a b c
means that going around
clockwise from a
you reach b
before c
(b
is between a
and c
is meaningless on an
unoriented circle). A circular partial order is several, potentially intersecting, circles. A
circular preorder is like a circular partial order, but several points can coexist.
Note that the relations between CircularPreorder
, CircularPartialOrder
and CircularOrder
are subtler than between Preorder
, PartialOrder
, LinearOrder
. In particular, one cannot
simply extend the Btw
of a CircularPartialOrder
to make it a CircularOrder
.
One can translate from usual orders to circular ones by "closing the necklace at infinity". See
LE.toBtw
and LT.toSBtw
. Going the other way involves "cutting the necklace" or
"rolling the necklace open".
Examples #
Some concrete circular orders one encounters in the wild are ZMod n
for 0 < n
, Circle
,
Real.Angle
...
Main definitions #
Notes #
There's an unsolved diamond on OrderDual α
here. The instances LE α → Btw αᵒᵈ
and
LT α → SBtw αᵒᵈ
can each be inferred in two ways:
LE α
→Btw α
→Btw αᵒᵈ
vsLE α
→LE αᵒᵈ
→Btw αᵒᵈ
LT α
→SBtw α
→SBtw αᵒᵈ
vsLT α
→LT αᵒᵈ
→SBtw αᵒᵈ
The fields are propeq, but not defeq. It is temporarily fixed by turning the circularizing instances into definitions.
TODO #
Antisymmetry is quite weak in the sense that there's no way to discriminate which two points are
equal. This prevents defining closed-open intervals cIco
and cIoc
in the neat =
-less way. We
currently haven't defined them at all.
What is the correct generality of "rolling the necklace" open? At least, this works for α × β
and
β × α
where α
is a circular order and β
is a linear order.
What's next is to define circular groups and provide instances for ZMod n
, the usual circle group
Circle
, and RootsOfUnity M
. What conditions do we need on M
for this last one
to work?
We should have circular order homomorphisms. The typical example is
days_to_month : days_of_the_year →c months_of_the_year
which relates the circular order of days
and the circular order of months. Is α →c β
a good notation?
References #
Tags #
circular order, cyclic order, circularly ordered set, cyclically ordered set
A circular preorder is the analogue of a preorder where you can loop around. ≤
and <
are
replaced by ternary relations btw
and sbtw
. btw
is reflexive and cyclic. sbtw
is transitive.
- btw : α → α → α → Prop
- sbtw : α → α → α → Prop
- btw_refl : ∀ (a : α), btw a a a
a
is betweena
anda
. If
b
is betweena
andc
, thenc
is betweenb
anda
. This is motivated by imagining three points on a circle.Strict betweenness is given by betweenness in one direction and non-betweenness in the other.
I.e., if
b
is betweena
andc
but not betweenc
anda
, then we sayb
is strictly betweena
andc
.For any fixed
c
,fun a b ↦ sbtw a b c
is a transitive relation.I.e., given
a
b
d
c
in that "order", if we haveb
strictly betweena
andc
, andd
strictly betweenb
andc
, thend
is strictly betweena
andc
.
Instances
a
is between a
and a
.
If b
is between a
and c
, then c
is between b
and a
.
This is motivated by imagining three points on a circle.
Strict betweenness is given by betweenness in one direction and non-betweenness in the other.
I.e., if b
is between a
and c
but not between c
and a
, then we say b
is strictly
between a
and c
.
For any fixed c
, fun a b ↦ sbtw a b c
is a transitive relation.
I.e., given a
b
d
c
in that "order", if we have b
strictly between a
and c
, and d
strictly between b
and c
, then d
is strictly between a
and c
.
A circular order is the analogue of a linear order where you can loop around. ≤
and <
are
replaced by ternary relations btw
and sbtw
. btw
is reflexive, cyclic, antisymmetric and total.
sbtw
is transitive.
Instances
For any triple of points, the second is between the other two one way or another.
Circular preorders #
Alias of btw_cyclic_right
.
The order of the ↔
has been chosen so that rw [btw_cyclic]
cycles to the right while
rw [← btw_cyclic]
cycles to the left (thus following the prepended arrow).
Alias of btw_of_sbtw
.
Alias of not_btw_of_sbtw
.
Alias of not_sbtw_of_btw
.
Alias of sbtw_of_btw_not_btw
.
Alias of sbtw_cyclic_left
.
Alias of sbtw_cyclic_right
.
The order of the ↔
has been chosen so that rw [sbtw_cyclic]
cycles to the right while
rw [← sbtw_cyclic]
cycles to the left (thus following the prepended arrow).
Alias of sbtw_trans_right
.
Alias of sbtw_asymm
.
Circular partial orders #
Circular orders #
Circular intervals #
Circularizing instances #
The circular preorder obtained from "looping around" a preorder. See note [reducible non-instances].
Equations
- Preorder.toCircularPreorder α = CircularPreorder.mk ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ ⋯
Instances For
The circular partial order obtained from "looping around" a partial order. See note [reducible non-instances].
Equations
Instances For
The circular order obtained from "looping around" a linear order. See note [reducible non-instances].
Equations
Instances For
Dual constructions #
Equations
- OrderDual.btw α = { btw := fun (a b c : α) => btw c b a }
Equations
- OrderDual.sbtw α = { sbtw := fun (a b c : α) => sbtw c b a }
Equations
- OrderDual.circularPreorder α = CircularPreorder.mk ⋯ ⋯ ⋯ ⋯