- Boxes
- definitions
- Ellipses
- theorems and lemmas
- Blue border
- the statement of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Orange border
- the statement of this result is not ready to be formalized; the blueprint needs more work
- Blue background
- the proof of this result is ready to be formalized; all prerequisites are done
- Green border
- the statement of this result is formalized
- Green background
- the proof of this result is formalized
- Dark green background
- the proof of this result and all its ancestors are formalized
- Dark green border
- this is in Mathlib
If \(X_v\) and \(Y_v\) are families of topological spaces indexed by \(v\in V\), if \(f_v:X_v\to Y_v\) is a continuous map sending the subset \(C_v\subseteq X_v\) into \(D_v\subseteq Y_v\) then there’s an induced continuous map \(\prod '_v(X_v,C_v)\to \prod '_v(Y_v,D_v)\).
If all the \(f_v\) are homeomorphisms identifying \(C_v\) with \(D_v\) then the induced map on restricted products is also a homeomorphism (proof: apply the previous construction to \(f_v\) and their inverses)
In the same setup as definition 8.26 (\(V,W\) index sets, \(f:W\to V\), \(C_v\subseteq X_v\) and \(D_w\subseteq Y_w\), bijections \(b_v:X_v\to \prod _{w:f(w)=v}Y_w\) identifying \(C_v\) with \(\prod _{w:f(w)=v}D_w\)), if all the \(X_v\) and \(Y_w\) are furthermore topological spaces, all the \(C_v\) and \(D_w\) are open, and all the \(b_v\) are homeomorphisms, then the induced map \(\prod '_v(X_v,C_v)\to \prod '_w(Y_w,D_w)\) is also a homeomorphism.
\(\mathbb {\mathbb {A}_L^\infty }\) is homeomorphic to \(\prod _v(B\otimes _AK_v,B\otimes _AA_v)\).
If \(X_v\) and \(Y_v\) are topological spaces with open subspaces \(C_v\) and \(D_v\), then the obvious bijection \(\prod '_v(X_v \times Y_v,C_v\times D_v) \cong \left(\prod '_v(X_v,C_v)\right)\times \left(\prod '_v(Y_v,D_v)\right)\) is a homeomorphism, where the restricted products have the restricted product topology and the binary product has the product topology.
The \(A\)-bilinear map \(B\times K\to L\) sending \((b,k)\) to \(bk\) is surjective.
If \(0\not=b\in B\) then there exists \(0\not=a\in A\) such that \(b\) divides the image of \(a\) in \(B\).
This natural map \(L\otimes _K\mathbb {A}_{A,K}^\infty \to \mathbb {A}_{B,L}^\infty \) is an isomorphism.
The natural map \(B\otimes _A\mathbb {A}_K^\infty \to \mathbb {A}_L^\infty \) is a \(B\)-algebra isomorphism.
The natural map \(B\otimes _A\mathbb {A}_K^\infty \to R\) is a \(B\)-algebra isomorphism.
The ring \(R\) introduced above (the restricted product of the \(B\otimes _A K_v\) with respect to the \(B\otimes _A A_v\)) is isomorphic to \(\mathbb {A}_L\).
Giving \(L_w\) the \(K_v\)-algebra structure coming from the natural map \(K_v\to L_w\), the \(w\)-adic topology on \(L_w\) is the \(K_v\)-module topology.
There’s a natural ring map \(K_v\to L_w\) extending the map \(K\to L\). It is defined by completing the inclusion \(K\to L\) at the finite places \(v\) and \(w\) (which can be done because the previous lemma shows that the map is uniformly continuous for the \(v\)-adic and \(w\)-adic topologies).
If \(S\) is a finite set of nonzero primes of \(A\) then the natural map \(B\otimes ((\prod _{v\in S}K_v)\times (\prod _{v\notin S}A_v))\to (\prod _{v\in S}(B\otimes _AK_v))\times (\prod _{v\notin S}(B\otimes _AA_v))\) is an isomorphism.
If \(K\to L\) is a ring homomorphism between two number fields then there is a natural isomorphism (both topological and algebraic) \(L\otimes _KK_\infty \cong L_\infty \).
If \(K\) is a number field and \(v\) is a nonzero prime ideal of the integers of \(K\), then the integers of \(K_v\) is a compact open subgroup.
If \(R\) is a commutative ring, if \(M\) is a finitely presented \(R\)-module and if \(N_i\) are a collection of \(R\)-modules, then the canonical map \(M\otimes _R\prod _i N_i\to \prod _i(M\otimes _R N_i)\) is an isomorphism.
Let \(V\) and \(W\) be index sets, and let \(f:W\to V\) be a map with finite fibres. Let \(X_v\) be sets, with subsets \(C_v\), let \(Y_w\) be sets with subsets \(D_w\), and say for all \(v\in V\) we’re given a bijection \(X_v\to \prod _{w|f(w)=v}Y_w\), identifying \(C_v\) with \(\prod _{w:f(w)=v}D_w\). Then there’s an induced bijection between the restricted products \(\prod '_v(X_v,C_v)\) and \(\prod '_w(Y_w,D_w)\).